Analytical Framework
This is my personal framework for thinking about public businesses. I tend to focus on companies with durable advantages, strong economics, rational capital allocation, and a long runway for reinvestment.
I am less interested in predicting the next 12 months and more interested in understanding what conditions would allow a business to compound over many years.
What I Look For
- Durable advantage: a moat grounded in switching costs, network effects, scale, data, standards, or embedded distribution.
- Strong unit economics: high incremental returns without excessive capital required just to maintain position.
- Reinvestment runway: credible ways to deploy earnings at attractive rates over time.
- Owner-oriented management: sensible incentives, rational capital allocation, and long-term decision-making.
- Business clarity: a plain-language understanding of why the business wins and what could break the thesis.
How I Make Decisions
- Business first, price second: price affects expected return, but business quality determines whether I want to keep studying the company.
- Position size should follow understanding: larger positions require greater clarity about the business, valuation, risks, and downside.
- Base rates matter: few businesses compound for decades, so I try to separate durable economics from temporary performance.
- Capital allocation is often the hidden lever: reinvestment, buybacks, acquisitions, and balance-sheet decisions can materially affect long-term results.
What I Avoid
- Businesses that require heavy capital simply to maintain their position.
- Growth that depends primarily on easy financing, promotional sentiment, or aggressive assumptions.
- Complex situations where I cannot explain the edge or the downside in plain language.
- Short-term macro predictions disguised as company-specific fundamentals.
Temperament & Risk
I view volatility as different from permanent impairment. The risks I care about most are business deterioration, poor capital allocation, excessive leverage, and paying a price that leaves little room for future returns. My bias is toward fewer decisions, clearer reasoning, and longer evaluation periods.
Important Note
This framework is a description of how I think about my own public-market investing. It is not investment advice, a recommendation, or a process anyone else should rely on. I may own securities discussed in the essays linked on this site.